Judge prohibits mother
from speaking against homosexuality to her daughter
In
a different twist on the debate about homosexuality, a Colorado woman who broke
off a lesbian relationship after converting to Christianity is fighting a
judge’s order barring her from teaching her adopted daughter that
homosexuality is wrong.
The
case involves Dr. Cheryl Clark and her former partner, Elsey McLeod. The couple
split after Clark converted to Christianity in 2000. Clark had adopted a
daughter during the course of her relationship with McLeod, but McLeod never
adopted the child and had no legal ties to her.
In
April, however, Denver District Judge John Coughlin gave the women shared
custody and equal parenting time, saying that McLeod should be considered a
“psychological parent,” according to the Washington Times. On
matters of religion, the judge deferred to Clark, giving her “sole
responsibility” for the child’s religious upbringing.
That
“sole responsibility,” however, came with a caveat. The judge
ordered Clark to “make sure that there is nothing in the religious
upbringing or teaching that the minor child is exposed to that can be
considered homophobic.”
The
order against homophobic teaching sprang from a complaint from McLeod about
publications in the foyer of Clark’s church. The church displays an
assortment of pamphlets, including some published by Promise Keepers and Focus
on the Family. The judge ordered Clark against homophobic teaching after McLeod
testified that the religious materials at Clark’s church were
“somehow inappropriate,” according to court documents.
Clark
balked at the order, and has appealed it to the Colorado Court of Appeals,
challenging not only the prohibition on teachings against homosexuality, but
also McLeod’s legal status as a parent.
James
Rouse, Clark’s attorney, argues that Clark can teach her daughter the
tenets of Christianity without teaching her to hate. “Religious
conservatives are not typically homophobic in their behavior, even if they view
homosexual activity as morally wrong,” Rouse wrote in a brief.
“While
Clark has no intentions of exposing her child to anything inappropriate, the
order itself is a breathtakingly broad restriction on the fundamental rights of
Clark and her daughter” he said.
Rouse
said the judge’s order violates Clark’s First Amendment rights to
free speech and religion as well as her Fourteenth Amendment rights to direct
the religious upbringing of her child.
“The
state cannot get into the business of approving which churches Dr. Clark may
attend with her daughter, what theology or doctrine Dr. Clark [and her
daughter] may study or believe, nor can it create a state-approved list of
which churches are homophobic and which are not, nor can the state even
prohibit churches from teachings which the state considers homophobic,”
the appeal said.
Christian
groups are closely following the case which has broad implications for how much
control the courts can exert over the education and upbringing of children.
Clark
can’t practice her conservative Christian faith and abide by the
judge’s ruling, which is vague and unconstitutional, said Mathew Staver,
president and general counsel of Liberty Counsel, a Florida-based group that
provides legal support for Christian causes and has filed a brief in support of
Clark.
“This
is the state coming into a home and telling a mother what she can do and say in
her home,” Staver said in the brief. “It takes no stretch of the
imagination to envision a judge finding the mother in contempt of court for
merely teaching her daughter about the biblical truths on homosexuality.”
McLeod’s
response to the appeal is due from her attorneys in December.
— E.P.
News