Federal school prayer guidelines result in fewer complaints
With
high school graduation time approaching, the Department of Education’s
guidelines on constitutionally protected prayer in schools are becoming especially
pertinent. The guidelines were released in February, and school officials
had until March 15 to notify state officials of their compliance with the
guidelines. The state officials then had until April 15 to report that information
to the federal government.
The
Associated Press reported that while many schools have already done so, some
still have not. Letters outlining the new guidelines were sent to the 15,000
school districts in the country. “It was basically guidance to schools
telling them what’s permitted,” said Education Department spokeswoman
Susan Aspey. “The guidance is clear that states and school districts
that don’t comply with the guidance and the law do put their federal
funding at risk.”
“What
is critically important right now is as we approach graduation, for students
to understand that, if they’re the class speaker and they want to include
a religious message as part of their prepared message, they have the right
to do that,” said Jay Sekulow, chief counsel of the American Center
for Law and Justice (ACLJ).
In
the past, graduation time has caused the ACLJ to be “literally inundated
with calls and questions on the issue of prayer at graduation ceremonies,”
said Sekulow. “While we’ve had a number of calls [this year],
they’ve all been resolved easily, and there’s a lot more uniformity,
because students and school administrators understand exactly what the rules
are.”
Sekulow
appreciates the new guidelines because they help clear up past confusion over
what is and is not allowed on school grounds. “I thought the guidelines
were a good idea,” he said.
Richard
Land, president of the Southern Baptist Convention’s Ethics and Religious
Liberty Commission, said that the guidelines will help dispel the myth that
“public school property is to be not only a religiously neutral place
for government-sponsored expression but a place where student religious expression
is suppressed or censored.”
The
new guidelines, which were required to be issued by the No Child Left Behind
Act of 2001, were developed by Secretary of Education Rod Paige. Each year,
schools will be required to submit a letter of compliance with the guidelines
by October 1.
“Secretary
Paige’s guidelines make it abundantly clear that our nation’s
public school systems do not leave their First Amendment rights of the religious
expression at the boundary of public school property,” said Land. “This
helps in that there are consequences for ignoring the First Amendment in a
public school.”
The
rules specifically outline what is and what is not allowed in schools. For
example, students are allowed to read a Bible during lunch or recess and express
their faith in homework assignments. Schools are prohibited from endorsing
a religion by doing things such as encouraging students to pray. The rules
also say that students may organize prayer groups or religious clubs and teachers
may take part in these groups if it is clear that they are doing so outside
of their “official capacity.”
In
a related story, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is threatening
a lawsuit against a Kansas school principal for suggestions she made regarding
the National Day of Prayer (NDP). Ellen Green, in her weekly memo to teachers
at Fairfield West Elementary School, urged teachers at the school to stand
next to their students’ desks and pray for them during the NDP.
Green
wrote, “God honors those who honor Him and seek His will. I plan to
make this a day of prayer and fasting. I would welcome your joining me in
seeking God’s favor and direction.”
“I
think it’s ridiculous that the ACLU is threatening a lawsuit and bringing
this case, trying to say that this is somehow a separation of church and state
issue,” said Mat Staver, president of Liberty Counsel. “Clearly,
I think, if the President of the United States can attend a NDP event, then
a principal of a school can ask her teachers to be able to pray for students
in that school.”
Green
said she told the teachers not to pray during school hours or in a “way
that would be inappropriate or offensive to anyone.” The National Education
Association (NEA) is also considering taking action against Green.
“Whenever
there’s a liberal cause, the NEA will stand up for the academic freedom
of teachers or principals; but when it comes to the issue of religion or some
conservative cause, all of a sudden they forget about those same principles,”
said Staver.
— E.P.
News